| Srinarayan ("Sri") Sharma 302 Varner Hall (248) 370-4088 srisharm@oakland.edu | Section: U5480 Class Times: TH 6:30-9:20 p.m. 480 Varner Hall Office Hours: T TH 5:00-6:30 p.m. & by appointment |
| http://www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/sharma/mis525/U80w97.html | |
Required Text
Davenport, Thomas H. Process Innovation: Reengineering work
through Information Technology. Harvard University Press:
Boston, 1993.
Optional Text
Hammer, Michael and Champy, James. Reengineering the Corporation:
A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Collins: New York,
1993.
Cases
Objectives of the Course
The competitive climate of the 1990s requires that organizations
devise methods for changing and improving activities crucial to
their mission. Organizational performance improvement must include
the identification and analysis of key processes and their redesign
using available technological and organizational resources. The
main objective of this course is to prepare students for a significant
role in an organization where processes are designed and managed
in such a way that costs are minimized, quality is increased,
and customers are satisfied. The students will also be prepared
to undertake a project that aims to design a process to achieve
these objectives.
At the completion of the course, the students will be able to:
Conduct of the Course
The course will consist of lectures, discussions, group projects,
and in-class exercises. I will attempt to have available at the
time of the class, all lecture notes in a PowerPoint document
to minimize the burden of note taking. Most activities will depend
on the active participation of the students in the class (e.g.
discussion about the lecture material and active involvement in
solving the cases). Graded material will include: one examination,
an ongoing group project that involves the solution of an in-class
case, in class case discussions, and a final project. In addition,
there may be some smaller exercises concerning the use of the
AdvanEdge process modeling tool Optima.
Project.
Each student will be responsible for completing a project that
integrates the materials from this course. The project will consist
of an analysis and description of the redesign of a process in
your organization or in one that you know about. It is important
that each student keep the final project in mind during the term
in order to collect data, make notes, and perform preliminary
analysis relevant to the project. Upon completion of the project
proposal, the student will receive feedback from the instructor
to guide the final project. Naturally, a more clear description
in the proposal will enable more beneficial feedback from the
instructor.
The final project will be in the form of a business report and
will be word processed with computer generated diagrams. The report
should include an executive summary and a description of the firm,
its market, competitors, and customers. The following components
will be required:
13. Lessons learned - what did you learn from doing this project?
Grading
Grades will be determined approximately as follows:
| Exam | 30% |
| In class case and exercises | 25% |
| Final project | 25% |
| Case discussions | 20% |
| Jan 9 | |||
| Jan 16 | Introduction | Chapter 1 | Hammer article
Davenport interview |
| Jan 23 | Hammer Video Davenport interview | Hammer article Davenport interview |
|
| Jan 30 | Process Identification | Chap. 2
CIGNA Corp. | Bambino Handout |
| Feb 6 | Process Enablers: Information Technology | Chap. 3-4
Bambino case | Project Proposal Due |
| Feb 13 | Organizational and HR Enablers | Chap. 5
Bambino case | |
| Feb 20 | Creating a Process Vision | Chap. 6
Bambino case presentation Siemens-Rolm case | |
| Feb 27 | Winter Recess | ||
| Mar 6 | Process Understanding | Chap. 7
ISSC case Bambino case |
|
| Mar 13 | New Process Design | Chap. 8
Bambino case | |
| Mar 20 | Change Management | Chap. 9
PacBell case Bambino case | |
| Mar 27 | Implementation | Chap. 10
IRS case Bambino case |
Assignment on Process Map Reassigned |
| Apr 3 | Bambino: Process Simulation and New Process Design | KMPG case | Assignment on Process Map Due Assignment on Process Simulation Given |
| Apr 10 | Bambino: New Process Design | Assignment on Process Simulation Due Assignment on New Process Design Given | |
| Apr 17 | Review, Project Related Questions | Assignment on New Process Design Due | |
| April 24 | Final Exam (7:00-10:00 p.m.) | Final Individual Project Due |
Books
Johansson, Henry J., McHugh, Patrick A., Pendlebury, John, and
Wheeler, William III. Business Process Reengineering: Breakpoint
Strategies for Market Dominance. Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1993.
Lockamy, Archie III and Cox, James F. III. Reengineering Performance
Measurement: How to Align Systems to Improve Processes, Products,
and Profits. Irwin: Burr Ridge, IL, 1994.
Articles
Lucas, Henry C Jr; Berndt, Donald J; Truman, Greg. A reengineering
framework for evaluating a financial imaging system. Communications
of the ACM, Vol. 39, No. 5, May 1996, pp. 86-96.
Buzacott, John A. Commonalties in reengineered business processes: Models
and issues. Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 5, May 1996,
pp. 768-782.
Stoddard, Donna B; Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L; Little, John Michael.
The reality of business reengineering: Pacific Bell's Centrex
provisioning process. California Management Review, Vol.
38, No. 3, Spring 1996, pp. 57-76.
Candler, James W; Palvia, Prashant C; Thompson, Jane D; Zeltmann,
Steven M. The ORION project: Staged business process reengineering
at FedEx. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 39, No. 2, Feb
1996, pp. 99-107.
Holden, Tony; Wilhelmij, Paul. Improved decision making through
better integration human resource and business process factors
in a hospital situation. Journal of Management Information
Systems, Vol. 12, No. 3, Winter 1995/1996, pp. 21-41.
Clemons, Eric K; Thatcher, Matt E; Row, Michael C. Identifying
sources of reengineering failures: A study of the behavioral factors
contributing to reengineering risks. Journal of Management
Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, Fall 1995, pp. 9-36.
Bartlett, Christopher A; Ghoshal, Sumantra. Rebuilding behavioral
context: Turn process reengineering into people rejuvenation.
Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, Fall 1995, pp.
11-23.
Sachs, Patricia. Representations of work: Transforming work: Collaboration,
learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38,
No. 9, Sep 1995, pp. 36-44.
Anonymous. Beyond total quality management and reengineering:
Managing through processes. Harvard Business Review, Vol.
73, No. 5, Sep/Oct 1995, pp. 80-81.
Earl, Michael J; Sampler, Jeffrey L; Short, James E. Strategies
for business process reengineering: Evidence from field studies.
Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No.
1, Summer 1995, pp. 31-56.
Davenport, Thomas H; Beers, Michael C. Managing information about
processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.
12, No. 1, Summer 1995, pp. 57-80.
Stoddard, Donna B; Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L. Business process redesign:
Tactics for managing radical change. Journal of Management
Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 1, Summer 1995, pp. 81-107.
Grover, Varun; Jeong, Seung Ryul; Kettinger, William J; Teng,
James T C. The implementation of business process reengineering.
Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No.
1, Summer 1995, pp. 109-144.
Cooper, Robin; Markus, M Lynne. Human reengineering. Sloan
Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, Summer 1995, pp. 39-50
Martinez, Erwin V. Successful reengineering demands IS/business
partnerships. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 4,
Summer 1995, pp. 51-60
Clemons, Eric K. Using scenario analysis to manage the strategic
risks of reengineering. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36,
No. 4, Summer 1995, pp. 61-71.
Allen, C Dennis. Succeeding as a clandestine change agent. Communications
of the ACM, Vol. 38, No. 5, May 1995, pp. 81-86.
Miles, Raymond E; Coleman, Henry J Jr; Creed, W E Douglas. Keys
to success in corporate redesign. California Management Review,
Vol. 37, No. 3, Spring 1995, pp. 128-145.
Kiely, Thomas J. Managing change: Why reengineering projects fail.
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 2, Mar/Apr 1995,
p. 15.
Kotter, John P. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail.
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 2, Mar/Apr 1995,
pp. 59-67
Anonymous. Two (very different) success stories. Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 73, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1995, pp. 70-71.
Ghoshal, Sumantra; Bartlett, Christopher A. Changing the role
of top management: Beyond structure to processes. Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 73, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1995, pp. 86-96.
Davenport, Thomas H; Nohria, Nitin. Case management and the integration
of labor. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, Winter
1994, pp. 11-23.
Venkatraman, N. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation
to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review,
Vol. 35, No. 2, Winter 1994, pp. 73-87.
Riggins, Frederick J; Mukhopadhyay, Tridas. Interdependent benefits
from interorganizational systems: Opportunities for business partner
reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems,
Vol. 11, No. 2, Fall 1994, pp. 37-57.
Sampler, Jeffrey L; Short, James E. An examination of information
technology's impact on the value of information and expertise:
Implications for organizational change. Journal of Management
Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, Fall 1994, pp. 59-73.
Anonymous. The perils of inadequate leadership. Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 72, No. 5, Sep/Oct 1994, pp. 137.
Caron, J Raymond; Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L; Stoddard, Donna B. Business
reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: Experiences and lessons learned
from the first five years. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.
3, Sep 1994, pp. 233-250.
Dixon, J Robb; Arnold, Peter; Heineke, Janelle; Kim, Jay S; Mulligan,
Paul Business process reengineering: Improving in new strategic
directions. California Management Review, Vol. 36, No.
4, Summer 1994, pp. 93-108.
Schonberger, Richard J. Human resource management lessons from
a decade of total quality management and reengineering. California
Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, Summer 1994, pp. 109-123.
Markus, M Lynne; Keil, Mark. If we build it, they will come: Designing
information systems that people want to use. Sloan Management
Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, Summer 1994, pp. 11-25.
Davenport, Thomas H; Stoddard, Donna B. Reengineering: Business
change of mythic proportions? MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.
2, Jun 1994, pp. 121-127.
Teng, James T C; Grover, Varun; Fiedler, Kirk D. Business process
reengineering: Charting a strategic path for the information age.
California Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, Spring 1994,
pp. 9-31.
Kambil, Ajit; Short, James E. Electronic integration and business network redesign: A
roles-linkage perspective. Journal of Management Information
Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, Spring 1994, pp. 59-83.
Newman, Julie; Kozar, Kenneth A. A multimedia solution to productivity
gridlock: A re-engineered jewelry appraisal system at Zale Corporation.
MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1, Mar 1994, pp. 21-30.
Dennis, Alan R; Daniels, Robert M Jr; Hayes, Glenda; Nunamaker,
Jay F Jr. Methodology-driven use of automated support in business
process re-engineering. Journal of Management Information Systems,
Vol. 10, No. 3, Winter 1993-1994, pp. 117-138.
Goss, Tracy; Pascale, Richard; Athos, Anthony. The reinvention
roller coaster: Risking the present for a powerful future. Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, Nov/Dec 1993, pp. 97-108.
Duck, Jeanie Daniel. Managing change: The art of balancing. Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, Nov/Dec 1993, pp. 109-118.
Hall, Gene; Rosenthal, Jim; Wade, Judy. How to make reengineering
really work. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, Nov/Dec
1993, pp. 119-131.
Davenport, Thomas H. Reengineering the Corporation. Sloan Management
Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, Fall 1993, pp. 103-104.
Short, James E; Venkatraman, N. Beyond Business Process Redesign:
Redefining Baxter's Business Network. Sloan Management Review,
Vol. 34, No. 1, Fall 1992, pp. 7-20.
Curtis, Bill; Kellner, Marc I; Over, Jim. Process Modeling. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 9, Sep 1992, pp. 75-90.